Me

Following uploads are desgined for Sem project..

How to see lucid dream

So some time you have seen a differnt thing in your dream, and that is they are really different ones from other...



And what is the difference, unlike other dream they are under your full control. Whatever you wish or think, dream goes as such.
So after this experience you searchred it on googe, and after reading it you came to know about word "Lucid" dream.
So how to have such experience again, Here is the trick and is sure one.

1.)Before going to bed, burn a candel.

2.)Concentrate on its burning flame for 15minutes or till you fall asleep.
3.)Remember chances depends on your quality of concentration.So please do it wisely.

4.)As you start feeling sleepy, close your eyes, and think abot the flame only, see its image in yourself, I mean just imagine what you have just looked outside.

It might take you a week for first time, but not more than week.

You will start having lucid dreams regularly, and even if you left your exercise, they will still go on their own for a few long time...

How to eat a MANGO

Well eating mango is not a easy job. Not all people know how to eat a mango. We all have seen them when they eat, they just turn themselves into a live monkey...:)
But some us have learned the right way of eating a mango, and those who still willing to know how to eat mango like royals, will learn it here.

Even I was a one of that live monkey before, but one day my elder sister guided me about a new way of eating mango.
And believe that was really a royal way..
Most of us even like me have habbit of eating it through our hands, and no matter how safely we try it, it still gets our face dirty.
So what my sister suggested is that eat it with spoon..
Yes just cut the mango in pieces without undressing him like a hood princess...:)

Cut it in pieces.

Take spoon and eat it's yellow stuff through your spoon like you are eating that icecream cup of summer.
It is the perfect method so far I learned..If you have any other, post it here, so that we finally discover the new secret of life that really matters sometimes...:)

Tim Hudson Ankle Injury needs a Surgery..

Tim Injury Photo

Tim Hudson needs surgery on his broken right ankle, an injury that leaves the NL East-leading Atlanta Braves without one of their top pitchers.

Hudson got hurt while covering first base Wednesday night during an 8-2 victory over the Mets in New York when Eric Young Jr. stepped on the back of his lower leg. The 38-year-old righthander was carted off the field in obvious pain.

He had X-rays at Citi Field, and the Braves say he will undergo surgery in Atlanta once the swelling goes down. It’s unclear how long Hudson will be out or whether he’ll be able to pitch again this season.

Hudson took a shutout into the eighth inning before getting carted off the field.

Evan Gattis, Dan Uggla, and Andrelton Simmons homered off an ineffective Jeremy Hefner to help the Braves’ bats break loose after scoring only four runs in their previous three games.

Hudson (8-7) was working on a four-hitter when Young hit a grounder that was knocked down by Braves first baseman Freddie Freeman. Hudson took Freeman’s toss at the bag just before Young arrived, and the speedy outfielder stepped on the back of Hudson’s lower right leg, near his Achilles’, driving the pitcher’s right ankle awkwardly into the ground.

Hudson immediately went down in obvious pain, and Young rushed over to check on him. The crowd at Citi Field groaned when the replay was shown on the big video board.

Rangers 3, Yankees 1 — Matt Garza pitched into the eighth inning of his Rangers debut, the only run he allowed unearned after his throwing error, and Texas beat New York in Arlington, Texas.

Garza (1-0) was 6-1 in his 11 starts this season for the Cubs before being traded Monday to the Rangers, who had long coveted the righthander. He was 5-0 with a 1.24 ERA his last six starts for Chicago, winning the last five.

Angels 1, Twins 0 — Jered Weaver (5-5) outpitched Mike Pelfrey with eight innings of two-hit ball, and Albert Pujols drove in the only run, leading host Los Angeles over Minnesota.

Dodgers 8, Blue Jays 3 — Mark Ellis hit a two-run homer to highlight Los Angeles’s five-run 10th inning as the Dodgers completed a three-game sweep in Toronto.

Athletics 4, Astros 3 — Coco Crisp hit a two-run homer in Oakland’s three-run seventh inning to help the Athletics beat host Houston.

Rockies 2, Marlins 1 — Jorge De La Rosa tossed six scoreless innings, Todd Helton doubled and scored a run, and host Colorado held on beat Miami.

Cardinals 11, Phillies 3 — Jake Westbrook pitched seven solid innings and contributed offensively with his second career steal, leading St. Louis over visiting Philadelphia.

Indians 10, Mariners 1 — Scott Kazmir allowed just one hit over his eight innings, Michael Bourn hit his first career grand slam, and visiting Cleveland routed Seattle.

Pirates 4, Nationals 2 — Pirates lefthander Francisco Liriano did not allow a hit until the sixth inning against a struggling and depleted Nationals lineup, and Pedro Alvarez homered off an otherwise dominant Stephen Strasburg, leading Pittsburgh past host Washington.

Tigers 6, White Sox 2 — Prince Fielder, Austin Jackson, and Torii Hunter homered, and Anibal Sanchez pitched six scoreless innings to help visiting Detroit overcome Miguel Cabrera’s absence in a win over Chicago.

Brewers 3, Padres 1 — Kyle Lohse pitched seven strong innings, and Carlos Gomez had four hits and drove in two runs to lead host Milwaukee over San Diego.

Royals 4, Orioles 3 — Eric Hosmer hit two home runs, and Alcides Escobar drove in the winning run in the ninth to lift Kansas City past visiting Baltimore.

Google Chromecast to follow Apple TV for doing the living room perfectly right

Amazon has the Google Chromecast listed as a "HDMI streaming media player", but it's way more than that.

It's a very clever little device that shows how to do the living room right.

The living room isn't as important as it once was. This isn't the 1960s where we all cluster round and spend all our time as a happy little nuclear family in one place.

The home is now a place where we consume content through mobile devices wherever we happen to be inside it. Increasingly, we're spending more time away from broadcast television, plus more time relating to others through social networking services. Sitting down and actually watching TV together is happening less.

In that context it makes far more sense to invent a little device that can somehow improve every television in the house in some way. Which is exactly what Chromecast is. Spend $35, somehow work out how to get power to it, somehow set it up, and your existing TV is a little bit improved.

I'm a big fan of Apple TV, not necessarily because it's any good (it's "just OK" implementation-wise), but because Apple has managed to invade living rooms in a totally stealthy way. There's nothing flashy or complex about Apple TV -- it's just a little box that lets you play content you buy from iTunes, or Netflix, and do some other things.

Like Chromecast, it's not clever or flashy. It's cheap, and it makes the television that it's connected to a little bit better. A small improvement.

Compare this to Xbox One, which is designed from the perspective of doing an "HDMI pass-through". In this arrangement, the Xbox One drives an existing cable TV box in order to get live content on the screen. Presuming people still watch live TV. Which they're increasing not preferring on-demand, pick-and-choose-whatever style consumption. Plus, the Xbox One experience will be forever irreparably broken by the fact that the last thing the cable TV companies want is Microsoft (or anyone) sitting in the middle of their channel reducing the amount of direct customer they have with their customers.

Xbox One is, classicly, overly engineered, and technologist-led. It's not a simple, cheap device that makes a television set a little bit better.

Boards

I subscribe to the school of thought that the post-PC devices that we are enjoying today are rooted in work done as part of the "ubiquitious computing" movement. Often shortened to "ubicomp", I've written about this before, as has my ZDNet colleague Simon Bisson: "Post-PC, or just the return of ubicomp".

The basic idea of ubicomp is that you have simple devices always around you that you use to easily access your "digital life". A smartphone is a good example of a ubicomp device. For example, you might be out with the kids, you'll take a photo of it and share it on Instagram. The thing that you're doing is playing with the kids. You access a ubicomp device (your smartphone) to take the photo and then share the photo on your social network.

The man who spearheaded the ubicomp movement, Mark Weiser, saw that ubicomp would have three types of devices. Specifically, "tabs", "pads", and "boards". Tabs are what we call smartphones. Pads are what we call tablets (or even "iPad"). Boards, however, are missing.

In ubicomp, the different devices are defined by their size. Tabs are supposed to be "wearable", pads are supposed to be "decimetre-scale", and boards are supposed to be "metre-scale". (Wearable in a ubicomp context applied to the reality of what the market has provided today really means "hyperportable" -- i.e. so small you take it with you everywhere.)

In domestic settings, we have metre-scale "things", and we happen to call them television sets. But they're not very smart. They just take a signal and translate it. Manufacturers have tried to make the TV smarter -- like Samsung with it's Smart TV app catalogue, although rarely people consume this smartness.

This is classic technologist thinking. People don't want apps that they can run on their TVs. It has to be a "little better", as opposed to being so different is actually gets in the way of doing what the TV is good at -- i.e. presenting content to people sitting in front of it.

What the Chromecast lets you do is take content from anywhere and "throw" it up onto any television set in the home. This simple little device could be what "disrupts" the normal television set and changes it into a ubicomp board.

That's a simple, cheap change. What it does is allow the user to take the smartphone and tablet that they already love, and get a better experience by being able to see it's content up on the big screen. Both of these devices are limited by the size of the screen.

That would then give us the full set -- tabs, pads, and boards, and seeing as post-PC and ubicomp are tied at the hip it changes the nature of the television set and turns it into a post-PC device.

So what?

What the Chromecast does, and devices that will follow it will do, is extend out the world that we love of smartphones and tablets, not require us to change the way in which we use them, and then improves the experience. This $35 piece of kit changes that dynamic, but within the sphere of being in a post-PC world. This is all done in an gentle, organic way.

That approach always seems to play better in the post-PC world. Deep, technology-led thinking and complex products driven by technologists tend not to do well out there. (Surface RT, for example).

Simple, easy to grasp ideas that nudge the story gently on seem to do much better. Apple TV is like that, for example.

So will Chromecast be a big thing? I don't know. But I can see how it might augur a new device category that ushers in some very positive changes.

Sex Tape Royalties : Earn 7 figures dollar like Farrah Abraham

If you are a young hot attractive girl and want to make a lots of dollar earning for easiest task..
Then you have got a good news. Follow Farrah Abraham footstep, and release a sex tape.
 Sounds great right? But can someone really make a lot of money off a sex tape? Well, put it this way: When you combine the seven figure payday Farrah got back in May with her current monthly royalty checks, she is earning enough money to literally wipe her world famous "Back Door" with hundred dollar bills. Once you read how much money Farrah will take home after taxes in 2013, let us know if you think it was worth it… in the end 

In case you have no idea who Farrah Abraham is, (and if that is the case, you are my idol), she first gained fame on the exploitative MTV reality show "Teen Mom", back in 2009. Before joining the show, Farrah was just your average 16 year old cheerleader from Council Bluffs, Iowa. Then she accidentally got pregnant by her boyfriend Derek Underwood who tragically died in a car accident just two months before their daughter Sophie was born. Farrah appeared on all four seasons of Teen Mom plus various one-off specials until MTV mercifully pulled the plug.

"Farrah Superstar: Backdoor Teen Mom" hit the world wide web on May 19th, 2013. Regardless of what her true intentions may have been, Vivid did end up paying Farrah a $1.5 million upfront fee for the rights to distribute her sex tape. On top of that, Farrah also negotiated a royalty arrangement that would pay her a percentage of the tape's profits after the $1.5 million advance had been earned back. Thanks to TMZ, which probably got their information from Farrah herself, we now know that her royalties are pretty impressive. Earlier today, TMZ released a photo of Farrah's first royalty check from Vivid. The check covers the first two months worth of sex tape royalties. So how much did Farrah earn in royalties for the months of June and July? $119,576.39. In other words, Farrah Abraham is earning $60,000 per month off her sex tape. Pretty impressive. And considering Vivid eventually earned a reported $77 million off the Pamela Anderson/Tommy Lee sex tape, maybe this is just the beginning?

After the show ended, Farrah apparently had not gotten her fill of attention and fame. She quickly appeared on several more MTV specials and eventually moved to Los Angeles to launch a career in the entertainment industry. Since she had essentially no talent or skills, she did what any aspiring young female celebrity would do… Take acting lessons? No. Get an internship at a production company? Never. Write a screen play? That would imply she knows how to read and write. Clearly Farrah had no other choice but to take the high road in Hollywood. And by high road, we obviously mean get fake boobs and start posing all over town in skimpy bikinis in front of the paparazzi.

Just as Farrah was starting to fade back into obscurity, she went nuclear. Following in the footsteps of attention-whore trailblazers like Kim Kardashian, Kendra Wilkinson and Pamela Anderson, Farrah decided to film and leak a sex tape. And just like Kim, Kendra and Pamela, Farrah claims the leak was not intentional. Farrah claims that she made the movie, co-starring porn star James Deen, so she could privately "celebrate her awesome body" forever. Unfortunately, James Deen pretty much announced that he was paid to film the scene and that the intention had always been to sell that tape. Furthermore, James intimated that Farrah already had an arrangement in place with porn mega-company Vivid Entertainment before he and Farrah even had sex.

"Farrah Superstar: Backdoor Teen Mom" hit the world wide web on May 19th, 2013. Regardless of what her true intentions may have been, Vivid did end up paying Farrah a $1.5 million upfront fee for the rights to distribute her sex tape. On top of that, Farrah also negotiated a royalty arrangement that would pay her a percentage of the tape's profits after the $1.5 million advance had been earned back. Thanks to TMZ, which probably got their information from Farrah herself, we now know that her royalties are pretty impressive. Earlier today, TMZ released a photo of Farrah's first royalty check from Vivid. The check covers the first two months worth of sex tape royalties. So how much did Farrah earn in royalties for the months of June and July? $119,576.39. In other words, Farrah Abraham is earning $60,000 per month off her sex tape. Pretty impressive. And considering Vivid eventually earned a reported $77 million off the Pamela Anderson/Tommy Lee sex tape, maybe this is just the beginning?

It's reasonable to assume that those royalties will eventually start to decline, but in the meantime Farrah should pull down a nice little income for 2013. Perhaps $300-400,000 in royalties before taxes. All told, when you combine royalties and the seven figure advance, Farrah should walk away with around $1.14 million free and clear after taxes. Not bad for a reality star with a G.E.D. And who knows, maybe this is just the first step in a long career for Ms. Abraham. Sounds laughable right? Keep in mind, this is exactly how Kim Kardashian launched her career. Today Kim runs a veritable media empire, has $40 million in the bank and a baby with Kanye West.

Sooo, now that you know the numbers… would you do it?

Report by http://www.celebritynetworth.com/

As Yankees search for offense, team grabs " biggest win of year " with 5-4 victory over Texas..

ARLINGTON, Texas — Eduardo Nunez
sprinted around the bases, eyes locked on
center field, watching an opportunity arise.
His helmet flew off after he passed first
base, having crushed a full-count slider off
Rangers closer Joe Nathan in the pivotal
moment of a 5-4 comeback victory.
Nunez’s hit tied the game in the ninth and
revived a moribund club. As he rounded
second, he saw outfielder Craig Gentry crash
into the wall. The baseball settled there. A
moment of comedy emerged from a mid-
season stretch marked by melancholy:
Overeager to score an inside-the-park
homer and pull his team ahead, Nunez
accelerated, stumbled and face-planted at
third.
“I tried too much,” Nunez said with a smile
inside a relieved clubhouse, happy enough
with his triple. “I fell over.”
Thus “the biggest win of the year,” as
outfielder Brett Gardner would call it,
would have to wait a moment. The go-
ahead hit belonged to recent call-up Brent
Lillibridge. He dunked a single into left
field. With one swing, Lillibridge atoned for
a sixth-inning error that led to a four-run
frame for the Rangers as the Yankees
(53-47) squandered an early three-run
advantage.
He also aided his manager, Joe Girardi, who
saw a decision that inning backfire. With
two outs, one on and a one-run lead,
Girardi removed starter Phil Hughes, who
had been scuffling all evening, despite
Texas’ lack of runs. Lefty specialist Boone
Logan promptly served up a two-run homer
to first baseman Mitch Moreland. But the
ninth inning eased the tension.
The victory could not have occurred at a
better time. The Yankees had lost five of
their last six. A cavalcade of forces – the
impending suspension of third baseman
Alex Rodriguez, the cratering performance
of designated hitter Travis Hafner, a year-
long, team-wide malaise at the plate – has
forced the front office into overdrive as
they hunt for upgrades before the July 31
trade deadline.
That search could lead to a reunion with
Cubs outfielder Alfonso Soriano, who the
Yankees traded away in 2004 to Texas in
order to acquire Rodriguez. The Yankees
are discussing a deal with Chicago for
Soriano, according to a person with
knowledge of the situation. The person
requested anonymity because nothing had
been finalized.
Earlier in the day, Chicago officials
downplayed speculation about Soriano.
Cubs manager Dale Sveum called the
discussion “overblown.” Team president
Theo Epstein said the Yankees weren’t “the
first team to call” about Soriano. For now,
the gap between the Yankees and Cubs
appears to relate to the payment of
Soriano’s salary. He makes $18 million this
season, and another $18 million for 2014.
The Yankees are still attempting to reduce
their payroll below $189 million for next
season. But they also need offense to
contend in 2013. They may soon lose their
highest-paid player. The suspension of Ryan
Braun for his role in the Biogenesis scandal
rocked baseball on Monday. Now the game
waits for Rodriguez’s punishment.
Braun accepted his penalty without
appealing. A publicist for Rodriguez did not
respond to messages seeking comment on
whether Rodriguez would negotiate a
similar deal with Major League Baseball.
Rodriguez has repeatedly denied any
involvement with the clinic or its founder,
Tony Bosch. But Braun’s acquiescence
appears to harm one of the tenets of
Rodriguez’s public defense, that Bosch’s
records that featured Rodriguez’s name
were counterfeit.
So the Yankees wait for a decision on
Rodriguez – and Rodriguez’s own decision.
But Soriano would be a useful addition,
especially for this team’s woeful right-
handed production, an egregious .589 on-
base plus slugging percetange heading into
Tuesday. Soriano has hit 17 homers this
season, with a .756 OPS before Tuesday.
Soriano told the Chicago Tribune the
Yankees had contacted his agent, but
because a trade had not been agreed upon,
he said he had not considered whether he
would waive his no-trade clause.
For now, the Yankees will carry on without
reinforcements. Girardi delighted in the
production from the bottom of his order
(doubles from Melky Mesa and Austin
Romine; the ninth-inning theatrics of Nunez
and Lillibridge).
“These guys,” Girardi said, “never give up.”